Sample Secretary’s Certificate: A Practical M&A Template
A simple, flexible Secretary’s Certificate template for private M&A closings, including vital board resolutions, incumbency, and good standing proof. Ideal for entrepreneurial M&A deals.
A simple, flexible Secretary’s Certificate template for private M&A closings, including vital board resolutions, incumbency, and good standing proof. Ideal for entrepreneurial M&A deals.
Learn the essentials of a pro-buyer long-form private merger agreement for a Delaware corporation, including key definitions, clauses, indemnities, and closing conditions—all in plain English.
Learn how MAC (Material Adverse Change) provisions in M&A deals shape risk allocation, key negotiating points, relevant case law, and practical strategies for entrepreneurs.
Explore the key regulatory and competitive considerations behind bank M&A deals. Learn about review processes, antitrust factors, and insider tips every founder needs to know.
Learn the essentials of M&A NDAs—from unilateral vs. mutual agreements to key provisions and potential pitfalls—so you can protect your startup’s confidential information and move forward with confidence
Learn why disclosure schedules matter in M&A deals, what goes into them, and how founders can draft and review these schedules with confidence.
License to Innovate: Empower your startup with Creative Commons to share ideas, protect IP, and foster collaboration in the entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Explore the key facets of California privacy and data security law, including CCPA, CPRA, data breach requirements, robocall and spam restrictions, and emerging AI considerations.
Explore our AI Consultant Agreement designed for service providers offering AI hardware, software, and solutions. Learn about key terms, quality standards, confidentiality, and branding guidelines to join our affiliate program effectively.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated Nasdaq’s diversity disclosure rules, which required companies to disclose the racial, gender, and sexual orientation of their directors or explain non-compliance. The court ruled the rules conflicted with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, finding they exceeded Nasdaq’s regulatory authority. The decision underscores limitations on self-regulatory organizations, emphasizing that exchange rules must align with the Act’s goals of preventing fraud and promoting fair markets.