AS SEEN ON
John Montague is a venture capital and technology attorney who advises founders, investors, and high-growth companies operating in emerging and transformative markets. Through Montague Law, John structures financings, governance systems, cross-border entities, and commercialization strategies for startups and investment platforms at the forefront of artificial intelligence, digital assets, blockchain infrastructure, and other next-generation industries.
His practice combines sophisticated transactional counsel with a deep understanding of evolving markets and innovative business models. John advises clients on venture financings, investor alignment, corporate governance, token and digital-asset frameworks, IP strategy, regulatory positioning, and scalable legal structures that support growth in complex and fast-moving sectors. He is particularly focused on helping clients navigate the legal and strategic challenges that arise at the intersection of innovation, capital formation, and global market expansion.
Before founding Montague Law, John practiced at Troutman Pepper Locke, where he focused on venture capital, private equity, and complex transactional matters. He brings more than a decade of experience advising on transformative financings, digital-asset structures, technology commercialization, and growth-stage corporate development.
John is based in Amelia Island, Florida, and represents clients across the United States and internationally.
At Montague Law, we have over a decade of experience providing regulatory and securities compliance to high-growth companies. Whether you are startup, a Web3 company or protocol, or have assets you are looking to protect, let the experienced attorneys at Montague Law guide you in your ventures.
30 big-law quality startup and business formation documents — from incorporation to investor agreements — free to download and customize.
BROWSE FORMS
Founders negotiate their own non-compete in the merger agreement and assume the restrictive-covenant work is done. The buyer’s separate ask for new non-competes from key employees is a quieter leverag
When the buyer is itself acquired during the earnout, the “no acceleration” default in most APAs hurts founders twice. Here is the recent doctrinal line and the drafting fix.
The stockholder representative clause looks like boilerplate. It is not. Whoever signs that paragraph holds unilateral authority over indemnification, escrow release, earnout disputes, and the disclosure schedule supplement — and is usually paid nothing for the role.
or fill out the form below for a consultation.
"*" indicates required fields