Joint Ventures in Florida: Legal Definition, Five-Factor Test, and Key Business Risks

Joint Ventures in Florida: Legal Definition, Five-Factor Test, and Key Business Risks

Two companies meet for coffee. They agree to “team up” on a limited project, split profits, and “figure the rest out later.” High-fives, then back to work. Six months on, one firm thinks they have a partnership; the other thinks they hired a vendor. Cue the lawsuit.

If you build companies in Florida, you’ll run into the joint-venture (JV) question—sometimes intentionally, often by accident. This founder-friendly guide gives you a clear framework, the Florida rules that actually matter, and a simple checklist to avoid unforced errors.

What a Florida joint venture is (and isn’t)

Plain-English definition. In Florida, a JV is a contract-based relationship where two or more parties combine resources (capital, assets, time, know-how) to carry out a particular business undertaking of limited scope or duration. Florida Bar resources confirm that JVs can be structured flexibly under state law.

Not just for individuals. Corporations and LLCs can be joint venturers, not just people (Florida Business Corporations Act).

Labels don’t control—substance does. Courts look at the actual agreement and the parties’ conduct. Even when documents use different labels, what you do can outweigh what you say. Florida case law provides multiple examples of courts re-characterizing relationships as JVs.

Intent is king (but paper and conduct are the crown)

The parties’ intentions are central to whether a JV exists, and a party claiming a JV must show the parties intended to create one. Courts determine intent under the ordinary rules of contract interpretation. A letter showing someone “got 49% of a project” did not create a JV where the company wasn’t a party, the claimant had no joint control, and there was no duty to share losses.

Courts say the parties’ intent controls; the label on the document doesn’t. Calling an agreement a “joint adventure” has some bearing but isn’t dispositive, and calling it something else (e.g., a “memorandum trust agreement”) doesn’t prevent a JV finding if the substance checks the boxes. Parties can create a JV notwithstanding a prior written contract—courts may infer intent from actual conduct; clear drafting and consistent behavior can also defeat a JV theory.

As to third parties. Between the venturers, actual intent matters; as to outsiders, legal intent and estoppel doctrines can control. If the parties do the things that constitute a JV, they may be treated as joint venturers toward third persons even if they hoped to avoid JV liabilities.

The Florida five-factor test (you need all five)

To create a JV, Florida decisions and the Attorney General identify five elements—plus a contract (express or implied):

  • Community of interest in a common purpose;
  • Joint control or right of control;
  • Joint proprietary interest in the subject matter;
  • Right to share profits; and
  • Duty to share losses.

Miss one, and you don’t have a JV. What counts as a JV is a question of law; whether your facts satisfy it is a question of fact decided from the whole relationship, not one isolated clause.

Statute of Frauds: when a handshake becomes a landmine

Real estate development JVs. Oral JV agreements to acquire/develop/sell real estate can be enforceable unless they require a transfer of property between the venturers, which triggers the Statute of Frauds and a signed writing. The actual land transfer itself is always within the Statute.

>1-year performance. If the JV cannot be performed within a year, Florida courts have applied the Statute of Frauds—get it in writing. Case law shows repeated enforcement of this rule.

Public-sector twist (if your counterparty is a government actor)

Florida constitutional limits and case law make some public entities poor JV partners. The Jackson-Shaw decision is the touchstone; consult the Attorney General’s guidance and relevant cases before structuring public-private “JVs.”

Tax treatment

Finally, don’t overlook the tax side. The IRS treats most joint ventures as partnerships for federal tax purposes, which means pass-through reporting and potential self-employment tax exposure.


Disclaimer: This post is general information, not legal advice. If you’re structuring (or unwinding) a JV—especially one involving Florida real estate or a public entity—get counsel to review your facts and your paper.

Legal Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. The content presented is not intended to be a substitute for professional legal, tax, or financial advice, nor should it be relied upon as such. Readers are encouraged to consult with their own attorney, CPA, and tax advisors to obtain specific guidance and advice tailored to their individual circumstances. No responsibility is assumed for any inaccuracies or errors in the information contained herein, and John Montague and Montague Law expressly disclaim any liability for any actions taken or not taken based on the information provided in this article.

Contact Info

Address: 5472 First Coast Hwy #14
Fernandina Beach, FL 32034

Phone: 904-234-5653

More Articles

man looking for investment in traditional and digital form

Master Joint Venture Agreement to Develop and Lease Shopping Centers

This Master Joint Venture Agreement governs the relationship between a company and a developer for acquiring, developing, leasing, and managing shopping centers. It sets out contributions, ownership interests, management rights, profit distributions, restrictions on transfers, and protections in case of death, dissolution, or termination.

Read More
Entertainment contract lawyer discussing a contract with a client

Regulation S: Offshore Offers and Sales Under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933

Discover the essentials of Regulation S, the SEC’s framework for governing securities offers and sales outside the U.S. without registration under the Securities Act of 1933. This comprehensive guide details key rules, definitions, and compliance requirements, including offshore transactions, distribution compliance periods, and restrictions on U.S. market activities. Perfect for issuers, distributors, and investors navigating international securities markets.

Read More
American Leadership in the Digital Finance Revolution: Montague’s Take

Project Crypto and the Digital Finance Revolution

SEC Chair Paul Atkins’ launch of Project Crypto signals a major shift in U.S. digital asset policy — from regulation by enforcement to risk-based rulemaking. In this analysis, Montague Law breaks down the initiative’s key pillars, what it means for token issuers and DeFi builders, and why this could mark the beginning of a more coherent, innovation-friendly legal framework for crypto in the U.S.

Read More