Maintaining VCOC Status: Long-Term Compliance and Strategic Considerations
While qualifying as a Venture Capital Operating Company (VCOC) provides immediate relief from ERISA compliance burdens, maintaining that status over the lifespan of a fund requires strategic foresight and diligent management. Meeting the 50% Test and the Actual Exercise Test at the outset is only the beginning—fund managers must continuously monitor portfolio investments, ensure active participation in governance, and make structured capital deployment decisions to avoid jeopardizing VCOC status.
For entrepreneurs raising venture capital from VCOCs, understanding these long-term compliance requirements is equally important. VCOC investors must exercise meaningful management rights in their portfolio companies to maintain their status, which directly influences board composition, investor protections, and corporate governance structures. Entrepreneurs who proactively align their governance frameworks with these venture capital requirements can attract capital more easily and avoid last-minute hurdles in negotiations.
The 50% Test: Managing Portfolio Composition Over Time
One of the most significant challenges for a VCOC fund is ensuring that it consistently meets the 50% investment threshold throughout its lifecycle. The rule requires that at least half of the fund’s assets (measured at cost) are invested in qualifying venture capital investments or derivative investments. Since portfolio dynamics evolve—especially with exits, IPOs, and portfolio company transformations—fund managers must anticipate shifts that could reduce their compliance margin.
For example, if a portfolio company goes public or undergoes a corporate reorganization, its classification as a venture capital investment could change. Fortunately, ERISA regulations allow such investments to be counted as derivative investments for a limited period, giving the fund time to adjust its asset allocation strategy. However, failing to rebalance capital appropriately before that period expires could result in falling below the 50% threshold, triggering an immediate loss of VCOC status.
Additionally, follow-on investments must be carefully planned. Once a fund enters its distribution phase, making new portfolio investments could unintentionally disqualify its VCOC status if the capital deployment does not align with the original qualifying investments. Fund managers should consider capital reserves, strategic exit planning, and reinvestment timing to ensure that any shifts in portfolio composition do not compromise their compliance.
The Actual Exercise Test: Proving Active Involvement in Portfolio Companies
Beyond maintaining proper investment allocation, a VCOC must demonstrate ongoing involvement in the governance of at least one of its portfolio companies each year. This Actual Exercise Test is not just a legal formality—it requires the fund to exercise real management rights, such as:
•Holding a board seat or maintaining board observer status
• Participating in corporate governance meetings
• Providing strategic advisory services
•Engaging in decision-making processes that impact the company’s direction
Critically, the fund must document these activities. Simply having contractual rights on paper is not enough—there must be a clear record of active participation in portfolio management. Many funds establish internal compliance procedures, such as maintaining meeting minutes, governance reports, and legal memos, to prove their ongoing exercise of management rights.
Common Pitfalls That Can Jeopardize VCOC Status
Even funds that initially qualify as VCOCs can lose their status if they fail to monitor compliance obligations. Some of the most common pitfalls include failure to rebalance portfolio allocations after IPOs or corporate restructurings, overcapitalization of subsidiaries before making qualifying investments, triggering ERISA exposure, and passive ownership of portfolio companies without exercising contractual management rights. Mismanagement of distribution periods can also lead to unintended disqualification, and a lack of investor safeguards, such as failing to provide VCOC certifications to ERISA investors, can create compliance risks.
Fund managers must remain proactive in their compliance strategies, implementing annual reviews, structured reporting, and strategic capital deployment to mitigate risks.
Investor Considerations: Why VCOC Status is a Competitive Advantage
For institutional investors, particularly those governed by ERISA, investing in a VCOC fund offers critical advantages. By maintaining VCOC status, the fund avoids being classified as holding plan assets, thereby removing the need for ERISA investors to navigate complex compliance hurdles. This makes the fund a more attractive investment vehicle, expanding its potential investor base.
Additionally, VCOC funds offer greater investment flexibility compared to non-qualifying funds. Since ERISA-imposed fiduciary constraints can limit investment strategies, avoiding plan asset classification allows fund managers to execute deals more efficiently without facing the same regulatory restrictions.
For these reasons, ERISA investors often require formal assurances of a fund’s VCOC status before committing capital. They may request:
- Annual VCOC compliance certifications from the general partner
- Legal opinions confirming initial and ongoing VCOC status
- Contractual withdrawal rights if the fund fails to maintain VCOC qualification
- Restrictions on fund structure amendments to preserve VCOC protections
Funds that proactively address these investor concerns can secure larger capital commitments and long-term institutional backing, making VCOC compliance not just a legal necessity, but a competitive advantage in fundraising.
Entrepreneurs and VCOC Investors: Aligning Interests for Successful Fundraising
Entrepreneurs raising capital from VCOC funds should understand that these investors operate under distinct regulatory constraints. Unlike traditional venture investors, VCOCs require defined governance rights, meaning that negotiating board representation, oversight mechanisms, and consultation privileges will be a fundamental part of securing investment.
From a startup perspective, embracing these governance structures can actually be beneficial. A VCOC-backed company gains access to investors who:
- Provide strategic operational insights
- Bring deep industry experience
- Are committed to long-term business growth
For founders, understanding how to structure governance agreements that meet VCOC requirements can make venture deals smoother and more efficient. Startups should be prepared to offer meaningful management rights, such as allowing investor representation on the board or granting direct advisory privileges that ensure compliance with the fund’s Actual Exercise Test.
Conclusion: The Strategic Role of VCOC Funds and the Legal Challenges Businesses Face
Montague Law understands that VCOC funds play a critical role in the venture capital ecosystem, enabling investment firms to access ERISA-governed capital while maintaining flexibility in their investment strategies. However, maintaining VCOC status requires meticulous oversight, as even minor missteps in investment structuring, management participation, or portfolio rebalancing can lead to regulatory pitfalls and the unintended application of ERISA fiduciary obligations.
For fund managers, staying compliant means continuously monitoring investment allocations, actively engaging with portfolio companies, and maintaining airtight governance structures. For institutional investors, VCOC-backed funds provide an attractive investment vehicle, offering access to high-growth startups without the regulatory burden of ERISA plan assets. Entrepreneurs raising capital from VCOCs must also align their governance structures and investment terms with these legal requirements to ensure a seamless funding process.
While structuring investments to meet ERISA and VCOC compliance is an essential component of venture capital fund management, it is only one part of the legal challenges businesses face. Beyond compliance and regulatory concerns, businesses of all sizes encounter a broad range of legal disputes that can threaten their financial stability, operations, and long-term success. From contract disputes and shareholder conflicts to intellectual property battles and business fraud claims, companies operating in today’s competitive marketplace must be prepared to navigate commercial litigation risks effectively.
For business owners, entrepreneurs, and investors, legal disputes are not a matter of “if” but “when.” The ability to proactively manage business risks, enforce contractual rights, and defend against legal claims is just as important as securing funding or maintaining regulatory compliance. That’s why having an experienced commercial litigation lawyer on your side is essential.
Let a Digital Assets Attorney Help
Do you have more questions about crypto and the law? Our team at Montague Law can provide you with the answers you want. You can easily contact one of our digital asset attorneys by calling us at 904-234-5653. Allow us to walk you through each step of this legal process.
